factcheck.orgは安全ですか?

WOT からの信頼

ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア

87%
WOT のセキュリティ スコアは、当社独自のテクノロジーとコミュニティの専門家によるレビューに基づいています。
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 4.6
WOTのアルゴリズム
92%
子供の安全性
92%

コミュニティは何と言っていますか?

レビューを残す

このウェブサイトを1から5の間で、どのように評価しますか?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
4.6
starstarstarstarhalf-star

30のレビューに基づく

並び順:
最新
Laughably fake site, barely even pretends to be legit. Funded by a left-wing think tank which is underwritten by Soros and other radical leftists. Only uses facts taken from leftist partner groups.
3
Lies and deliberate POLICITAL distortions ! Incompetent , and inaccurate reporting. Completely untrustworthy. FAKE NEWS !
役立つ
This article here: https://www.factcheck.org/2019/06/fake-mark-twain-quote-mocks-voting/ is a perfect example of why this is a completely untrustworthy site. There is no way (short of going back in time and following someone around their entire life) to factually claim that someone did not say a particular phrase. It is only possible to suggest there is no (currently known) documented instance of them saying such and such. So, to claim that an accredited statement is patently false, is misleading, at best. Then the site suggests what Mark Twain's political beliefs were based on one single quotation, taken completely out of context, again, misleading, at best. This site seems devoted to controlling information, utilizing mechanisms like "opinion" and "interpretations" (with and without obvious bias), and less on actual fact. Which seems less than transparent and devoid of journalistic integrity. Avoid information provided by this site at all costs...
1
Sitio de comprobación de noticias que combate los bulos y fake news. Orientado principalmente al votante de EEUU, pero también informa de temas globales como el COVID-19.
役立つ
I'm still surprised of this website's overall note is at 4.6, at the moment, although, when I compute the mean by myself of the 17 last comments (that I can see), is of 2.44. I guess This website was good in the past, but something happened around March 2020.
1
One-sided politically motivated site that is not interested reviewing/presenting all facts. Funding (pharmaceutical industry) is very questionable to say the least
1
Whoever rated this as "safe" needs to re-evaluate or hand the reigns over to a non-Liberal. This site is so full of lies and deceit.
1
very true information. checking all the false conservative lies.
役立つ
When you have to parse words, exclude certain things or misrepresent information .... your credibility is worthless.
4
One-sided. Makes snopes look ethical. I'd be interested in following the money for this site.
4
Nice website. Objective, Individual, Informative, Nice Looking, Great company to relay on. Keep making the internet the better place.
役立つ
One-sided politically motivated site that is not interested reviewing/presenting all facts. Website that is agendized to the far left.
4
Good site. A goto site for verifying the thousands of fake news disseminators on the web. If it seems to have a liberal bias, that's only because the main purveyors of "fake news" are there to inflame and motivate the alt-right conservative movement.
1
Many people mark it down because they are crybabies. They live in a fact-free world and base their lives and mental health on talk shows. Therefore when someone bursts their bubble they are going to lash out.
3
This site is part of the annenberg project a politically biased group that does fact checking spin based on party talking points rather than fact.
7
Such an obvious Liberal Bias. If someone has proof otherwise please let me know. The "facts" I have looked up on this site, while factual (as nearly as I can tell - I don't run a website purporting to provide accurate information), is certainly worded in such a way as to leave little doubt as to the political leanings of the writer (yes, similar to mine).
5
Gives sometimes half facts. Is not an impartial fact checking site.
2
Obviously biased favoring the left. It's obviously anti-gun. I'm not sure how people think it's a neutral site. Someone please explain that.
7
Sitio que revisa las declaraciones políticas en el sistema norteamericano.
2
12
侵害されていないか確認するGoogle に接続して閲覧履歴をスキャンします。
Google と接続
掲載されているもの
サインインすることで、当社の定めるデータ収集と使用に同意したことになります。 利用規約 及び 個人情報保護方針
alternative-placeholder

WOT について

私たちは 200 万以上のウェブサイトをレビューしました。 WOT は、迅速かつ安全にブラウジングできるように設計された軽量拡張機能です。 ブラウザをクリーンアップし、速度を上げ、個人情報を保護します。

これはあなたのウェブサイトですか?

ウェブサイトを申請して、WOT のビジネス ツールにアクセスし、顧客とつながりましょう。
このウェブサイトを連携する
このサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる