nationalreview.com é seguro?

This site is tolerable in terms of content, though it may make some wonder just which version of reality they live in. This site promotes rather nasty opinion as fact and as such is not a legitimate source of news information. This site lists contributors who have a very low standard of quality as well (D. Prager). There are so many tracking bugs and scripts on this site that it boggles the mind. I rate this site as being barely trustworthy; just barely.

Article about improving the U.S. Presidential debates does not mention the fact that there are other parties with candidates running for President who are not even invited to the debates. Libertarian Party candidates Jo Jorgensen and Spike Cohen will be on the Presidential ballot in all 50 states and DC. It is a travesty of democracy that the third largest political party in the U.S. is often ignored in the media and excluded from the debates!

I never even got a chance to see the politics that so many are complaining about. I had at least 16 scripts on the site marked as untrusted and probably even more XSSes that I left blocked. After all that was said and done the page couldn't even form. Hell no!

This is just another right wing news site. I don't see what the fuss is about. They claim to be a "website for conservative news, analysis, and opinion," and seem to be just that (although I think terming themselves "premier" is a bit much.) If they referred to themselves as objective, or even centrist, they would be misleading the public. These people are big-time conservatives. However, they aren't claiming this, they're a biased site that is entirely up front about being biased. Fringe sites like this (left or right) are useful for the obscure stories that big names don't cover, but I wouldn't use this site as a primary, or even secondary news source. I wouldn't recommend this site if you aren't familiar with the areas right-wingers tend to stretch the truth in, (not that I have been able to find any OUTRIGHT lies). You'll need your capacity for discernment here, though really that's true of anything on the internet. I did get one popup to a badly rated site, but I couldn't find any explicit images or viruses.

sleazy little affiliate spammers hitting spamtraps on behalf of ***** ***** ***** ip4:64.95.41.128/25 ip4:64.94.177.0/24 ip4:64.94.164.0/24 ip4:74.201.124.0/25 ~all" blifax.com. 10 IN TXT "v=spf1 a:69.26.100.190 all" blifax.com. 10 IN TXT "v=spf1 a:69.26.100.161 all" blifax.com. 10 IN TXT "v=spf1 a:69.26.100.167 all" Passive DNS for *ALL* IP RANGES ABOVE Passive DNS for NS1.BLIFAX.COM and *****

"Hate speech, outright lies, political pandering, Photoshopped content. Useless site." - genebuettner "Flagrantly anti-intellectual fake news." - zeekthegeek