Безопасен ли en25.com?

They spammed me with this: From: "Absolute" <chris@absolute.com> Reply-To: "Absolute Software" <marketing@absolute.com> Date: 1 Mar 2016 Subject: When Encryption Fails When Encryption Fails Encryption is not a security silver bullet. Multiple layers of defence are required. To ensure you stay out of the headlines, you must constantly audit your encryption status. If you rely on encryption as a security layer, watch this short video <https://www.absolute.com/en/resources/videos/demos/dds-04-encryption-fails> to learn how you can optimize encryption and keep your data safe. Contact us <https://www.absolute.com/en/about/contact?> if you have any questions. The Absolute Team This email was sent by Absolute <http://s2860.t.en25.com/e/er.aspx?> Suite 1600, Four Bentall Centre, 1055 Dunsmuir Street, PO Box 49211 Vancouver, BC V7X 1K8 Canada We respect your right to privacy <http://s2860.t.en25.com/e/er.aspx?5>. Click here <http://s2860.t.en25.com/e/sl to unsubscribe or manage your subscriptions.

This is Oracle's marketing solution eloqua. Shoot the messenger. Can we accuse Oracle for letting its customers misuse its services? Probably yes, to some degree. But when we give eloqua a bad rating, its well behaved customers will suffer from that bad rating too.

I've no idea if this site uses tracking cookies and I don't care as I have the add on DNTme installed on my Firefox browser. DNTme stands for Do Not Track me from Albine and goes way beyond anything else out there for blocking tracking cookies or other means of seeing what I'm doing on the internet. I have full control of who I am willing to allow to track me or not track me. For the most part it's easy and fully automatic, but gives me the option, if I choose, to change the blocking rules. It's available on C-Nets Download.com. Check it out and stop worrying about who is tracking you.

Here is what McAfee says lately: 1 green download In our tests, we found downloads on this site were free of adware, spyware, and other potentially unwanted programs.

This appears to be a marketing site so not necessarily bad unless it sends out unwanted ***** is what Google says lately: What is the current listing status for en25.com? This site is not currently listed as suspicious. What happened when Google visited this site? Of the 25 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 0 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2013-05-02, and suspicious content was never found on this site within the past 90 days. This site was hosted on 22 network(s) including AS4436 (AS), AS20940 (AKAMAI), AS2914 (NTT). Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware? Over the past 90 days, en25.com did not appear to function as an intermediary for the infection of any sites. Has this site hosted malware? No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.

As Digital Jedi and kwikone pointed out: this is not the company creating the spam, it is created by sub-domains of this one. This IS however the site SENDING the spam. Because the Spams and Scams are so prolific, I must assume that they take no or ineffective steps in reducing the spam they send or verifying that they are sending legitimate email. I got here because one of their sub-domains sent spam pretending to be Qualys, and it's not the first time. If en25 was legit, this would not stand and the senders would be purged.

Why penalize this site when it is some totally different site (albeit a sub domain of a subdomain of a subdomain etc) which is the culprit. People need yto be more accurate as to what site they are rating. Because of the rating of this site of of its sub sub domains gets tarred and feathered just because it has not had any ratings done yet (I got here because of this situation - and it was because of a well known established computer software vendor using a content delivery system of a sub sub sub domain)

This is another example of an ad click site getting rated down because of illegitimate services who misuse it. Why should emails from Wacom, ColourLovers and really any and all legitimate websites all be red and yellow, because people aren't taking the time to rate the actual website that spammed you?