Is nationalreview.com Safe?

Name: nationalreview.com
Rating: 4.3

Trusted by WOT

Website security score

83%

WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.

Is this website claimed?

Community reviews

★ 4.3

WOT’s algorithm

87%

Child Safety

89%

What does the community say?

Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website

Malware or Viruses

Poor customer service

Phishing

Scam

Potentially illegal

Misleading or unethical

Privacy Risk

Suspicious

Hate, discrimination

Spam

Potential unwanted program

Ads / Pop-ups

Adult Content

Incidental nudity

Gruesome or shocking

Cancel

Post Review

4.3

Based on 29 reviews

Sort by:

Newest

A440

4 years ago

This site is tolerable in terms of content, though it may make some wonder just which version of reality they live in. This site promotes rather nasty opinion as fact and as such is not a legitimate source of news information. This site lists contributors who have a very low standard of quality as well (D. Prager). There are so many tracking bugs and scripts on this site that it boggles the mind. I rate this site as being barely trustworthy; just barely.

RWPMH

4 years ago

Article about improving the U.S. Presidential debates does not mention the fact that there are other parties with candidates running for President who are not even invited to the debates. Libertarian Party candidates Jo Jorgensen and Spike Cohen will be on the Presidential ballot in all 50 states and DC. It is a travesty of democracy that the third largest political party in the U.S. is often ignored in the media and excluded from the debates!

Helpful

simpleman72685

4 years ago

Definitely a scam website. No real news website would make you pay to subscribe to content.

gareth edwards

6 years ago

Any site that proclaims children are born as defective beings should be shut down. Sickening.

michael.dooling

6 years ago

It has its obvious bias to the right but is no more "wrong" or "lying" via omission or selective reporting than CNN or MSNBC as some earlier commenters have claimed.

kenilchattiero

7 years ago

I have just read an article and I already feel that they highly manipulate informations. It does not seem objective.

broadwayblues

7 years ago

Seems to have an agenda and there's little real news here.

lodenstane

8 years ago

Stretched news OpEds disguised as legitimate reporting. Not a reliable place for facts.

Apollo702

9 years ago

I never even got a chance to see the politics that so many are complaining about. I had at least 16 scripts on the site marked as untrusted and probably even more XSSes that I left blocked. After all that was said and done the page couldn't even form. Hell no!

francisfeingold

9 years ago

WOT users, for crying out loud, please stop flagging respectable conservative news sites as possibly untrustworthy; this is not the first time.

malleus

9 years ago

Conservative political hyperbole

Tamil Har

9 years ago

A good news resource - fresh information and well-written articles.

dshinkleil

9 years ago

Serves a pop up ad for a fake virus removal scam

wot_42735

10 years ago

Openly discriminates against transgender people.

ericbhart

10 years ago

The ads from this site, which pop up IN SPITE OF A POP-UP BLOCKER, are of suspicious or questionable content, and lead you to sites that have a very bad WOT rating.

Coppermazov

10 years ago

This is just another right wing news site. I don't see what the fuss is about. They claim to be a "website for conservative news, analysis, and opinion," and seem to be just that (although I think terming themselves "premier" is a bit much.) If they referred to themselves as objective, or even centrist, they would be misleading the public. These people are big-time conservatives. However, they aren't claiming this, they're a biased site that is entirely up front about being biased. Fringe sites like this (left or right) are useful for the obscure stories that big names don't cover, but I wouldn't use this site as a primary, or even secondary news source. I wouldn't recommend this site if you aren't familiar with the areas right-wingers tend to stretch the truth in, (not that I have been able to find any OUTRIGHT lies). You'll need your capacity for discernment here, though really that's true of anything on the internet. I did get one popup to a badly rated site, but I couldn't find any explicit images or viruses.

gangstapolitica

11 years ago

Hate speech, outright lies, political pandering, Photoshopped content. Useless sit

GURBL

11 years ago

sleazy little affiliate spammers hitting spamtraps on behalf of ***** ***** ***** ip4:64.95.41.128/25 ip4:64.94.177.0/24 ip4:64.94.164.0/24 ip4:74.201.124.0/25 ~all" blifax.com. 10 IN TXT "v=spf1 a:69.26.100.190 all" blifax.com. 10 IN TXT "v=spf1 a:69.26.100.161 all" blifax.com. 10 IN TXT "v=spf1 a:69.26.100.167 all" Passive DNS for *ALL* IP RANGES ABOVE Passive DNS for NS1.BLIFAX.COM and *****

Yes!n

11 years ago

"Hate speech, outright lies, political pandering, Photoshopped content. Useless site." - genebuettner "Flagrantly anti-intellectual fake news." - zeekthegeek

zeekthegeek

12 years ago

Flagrantly anti-intellectual fake news.

Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.

Connect with Google

As seen on

By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.