Difference between revisions of "Hashtag"
(→spam) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
''Using hashtags allows you to conveniently describe the specific reason for a rating. For instance, if you are rating a site which you believe falls under the “scam” category, in your comment you can use a hashtag to describe the type of scam...'' read the introductory [https://www.mywot.com/blog/468-introducing-hashtags Blog post]. <br /> | ''Using hashtags allows you to conveniently describe the specific reason for a rating. For instance, if you are rating a site which you believe falls under the “scam” category, in your comment you can use a hashtag to describe the type of scam...'' read the introductory [https://www.mywot.com/blog/468-introducing-hashtags Blog post]. <br /> | ||
Join in the forum discussion: [https://www.mywot.com/forum/44100-hashtags Hashtags] | Join in the forum discussion: [https://www.mywot.com/forum/44100-hashtags Hashtags] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Positive rating comment == | ||
| + | To further expand on your <span style="color: #008000;">'''good'''</span> rating, you may want to add these hashtags in your comment. | ||
| + | ;#useful | ||
| + | ;#informative | ||
| + | ;#entertaining | ||
| + | ;#happycustomer | ||
| + | ;#goodcustomerexperience | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Neutral rating comment == | ||
| + | ;#useless | ||
| + | :no value, or having no beneficial use; futile or ineffective. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Negative rating comment == | ||
It is a good practice to point to some proof or evidence in the comment text alongside a #hashtag for verification. Here are some suggested hashtags with validating links: | It is a good practice to point to some proof or evidence in the comment text alongside a #hashtag for verification. Here are some suggested hashtags with validating links: | ||
| − | == Scam == | + | === Scam === |
;#smsscam | ;#smsscam | ||
:http://www.scamwatch.gov.au/content/index.phtml/tag/SMSCompetitionTriviaScams | :http://www.scamwatch.gov.au/content/index.phtml/tag/SMSCompetitionTriviaScams | ||
| Line 22: | Line 36: | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfeit_medications | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfeit_medications | ||
| − | == Malware == | + | === Malware === |
;#compromised | ;#compromised | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulnerability_%28computing%29 | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulnerability_%28computing%29 | ||
| Line 34: | Line 48: | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit | ||
| − | == Phishing == | + | === Phishing === |
;#419scam | ;#419scam | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/419_scams | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/419_scams | ||
| Line 42: | Line 56: | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyware | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyware | ||
| − | == spam == | + | === spam === |
;#spam | ;#spam | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29 | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29 | ||
| Line 48: | Line 62: | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamvertising | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamvertising | ||
| − | == Privacy concerns == | + | === Privacy concerns === |
;#adware | ;#adware | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adware | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adware | ||
| Line 54: | Line 68: | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eavesdropping | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eavesdropping | ||
| − | == Browser == | + | === Browser === |
;#toolbar | ;#toolbar | ||
:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_toolbar | :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_toolbar | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 23:06, 20 February 2014
Tue 18 Feb 2014
Using hashtags allows you to conveniently describe the specific reason for a rating. For instance, if you are rating a site which you believe falls under the “scam” category, in your comment you can use a hashtag to describe the type of scam... read the introductory Blog post.
Join in the forum discussion: Hashtags
Positive rating comment
To further expand on your good rating, you may want to add these hashtags in your comment.
- #useful
- #informative
- #entertaining
- #happycustomer
- #goodcustomerexperience
Neutral rating comment
- #useless
- no value, or having no beneficial use; futile or ineffective.
Negative rating comment
It is a good practice to point to some proof or evidence in the comment text alongside a #hashtag for verification. Here are some suggested hashtags with validating links:
Scam
- #smsscam
- http://www.scamwatch.gov.au/content/index.phtml/tag/SMSCompetitionTriviaScams
- #workathomescam
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-at-home_scheme
- #getrichquick
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Get-rich-quick_scheme
- #ponzi
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
- #pyramidscam
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_scheme
- #counterfeit
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfeit
- #pharma
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfeit_medications
Malware
- #compromised
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulnerability_%28computing%29
- #botnet
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet
- #ddos
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack
- #exploit
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploit_%28computer_security%29
- #rootkit
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit
Phishing
- #419scam
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/419_scams
- #crimeware
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimeware
- #spyware
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyware
spam
- #spam
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_%28electronic%29
- #spamvertised
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamvertising
Privacy concerns
- #adware
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adware
- #eavesdrop
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eavesdropping
