Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mass rating tool"
(→Help rectifying MASS mis-rating.: new section) |
(→http://www.picsdrive.com/john-currin/1: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
and it seems that the damage STILL hasn't been fixed, 2 years later. WTF? | and it seems that the damage STILL hasn't been fixed, 2 years later. WTF? | ||
I don't get how one user's ratings (it indicates the user Phung is responsible) would cause such a massive mis-rating. Did a bunch of mass rating tool users act like lemmings? Anyone? --[[User:MrElvey|MrElvey]] 23:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | I don't get how one user's ratings (it indicates the user Phung is responsible) would cause such a massive mis-rating. Did a bunch of mass rating tool users act like lemmings? Anyone? --[[User:MrElvey|MrElvey]] 23:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == http://www.picsdrive.com/john-currin/1 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Your retarded ROBOT marked an artist web site with every kind of red flag, 'because porn'. Just because some moron with a stick up his arse the size of a phone pole, and less emotional maturity than Beavis and Butthead decided to add something to a 'black list', somewhere, doesn't mean that your ROBOT should give infinite downvotes to sites based on that list. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah, 'child safety' maybe should get a lower rating, but EVERYTHING ELSE??? | ||
| + | |||
| + | In fact, anything your BOT (or any identified BOT) rates should be given a 'BOT' rating flags, and separate scores with/without the bots, so people can ignore the ratings given by that bot/those bots, BY DEFAULT. Because your crawler has got some obvious problems. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not that I expect anyone will ever read this. | ||
Revision as of 02:40, 17 December 2012
Catnose.com is R-Rated, but it is most definitely not hard porn. Please re-check.
Help rectifying MASS mis-rating.
http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/idahopotato.com links to http://www.mywot.com/en/forum/5034-be-sure-to-take-a-really-blaklist and it seems that the damage STILL hasn't been fixed, 2 years later. WTF? I don't get how one user's ratings (it indicates the user Phung is responsible) would cause such a massive mis-rating. Did a bunch of mass rating tool users act like lemmings? Anyone? --MrElvey 23:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
http://www.picsdrive.com/john-currin/1
Your retarded ROBOT marked an artist web site with every kind of red flag, 'because porn'. Just because some moron with a stick up his arse the size of a phone pole, and less emotional maturity than Beavis and Butthead decided to add something to a 'black list', somewhere, doesn't mean that your ROBOT should give infinite downvotes to sites based on that list.
Yeah, 'child safety' maybe should get a lower rating, but EVERYTHING ELSE???
In fact, anything your BOT (or any identified BOT) rates should be given a 'BOT' rating flags, and separate scores with/without the bots, so people can ignore the ratings given by that bot/those bots, BY DEFAULT. Because your crawler has got some obvious problems.
Not that I expect anyone will ever read this.
