Difference between revisions of "Talk:Activity scores"
(http://vasiliy-kovka.ru/foto-khudozhestvennoy-kovki) |
(→Wot a pay site? I DON'T THINK SO!) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Should there really be adverts on this page? | |
| + | |||
| + | == Wot a pay site? I DON'T THINK SO! == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why is it I'm seeing so many reviews with people writing that Wot is charging a fee now, monthly or otherwise? I have never been asked to pay a fee for Wot and WOT is a great site that needs people to know it's FREE! | ||
| + | |||
| + | ____ | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree with above | ||
| + | |||
| + | AGT | ||
| + | |||
| + | === | ||
| + | Possible another point of discussion: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - it seems (to me) the amount of given (re)views (with at least one comment?) is more important, reliable then the quality probably of view. With other words, a WOT-viewer with more then 1.500 given (or more) reviews is more reliable then a WOT-viewer, with less then 1.500 given reviews. I'm not 100% complete sure about my -own- statement. So its probably a discussion worth? What counts more quality of reviews or quantity of reviews, what is the best mix? | ||
| + | - the comments and this complete site is atm of writing this post, so seems it to me, more for only english understanding and reading surfers. However a lot of site's has their own language and with translating/ translated site's, the interpretation of words/frases could be very otherwise mented/intented for certain groups of visitors. Reviewers should be aware of the intentions of the makers, who are more volunteers, then quick-money-earners. This site is now only available for 2 languages. Instead of asking cash for their own reviews, it could be more wise to participate in translating this (WOT-)site to other languages?? | ||
| + | |||
| + | With kind regards, | ||
| + | A.G. Terpstra | ||
| + | |||
| + | p/s | ||
| + | I'm a Dutch visitor, so probably my english isn't excactly what you think/expect it should be. My apologises for how I express myself in a not my own, native, language, ... . | ||
Latest revision as of 23:48, 9 June 2015
Should there really be adverts on this page?
Wot a pay site? I DON'T THINK SO!
Why is it I'm seeing so many reviews with people writing that Wot is charging a fee now, monthly or otherwise? I have never been asked to pay a fee for Wot and WOT is a great site that needs people to know it's FREE!
____
I agree with above
AGT
=
Possible another point of discussion:
- it seems (to me) the amount of given (re)views (with at least one comment?) is more important, reliable then the quality probably of view. With other words, a WOT-viewer with more then 1.500 given (or more) reviews is more reliable then a WOT-viewer, with less then 1.500 given reviews. I'm not 100% complete sure about my -own- statement. So its probably a discussion worth? What counts more quality of reviews or quantity of reviews, what is the best mix? - the comments and this complete site is atm of writing this post, so seems it to me, more for only english understanding and reading surfers. However a lot of site's has their own language and with translating/ translated site's, the interpretation of words/frases could be very otherwise mented/intented for certain groups of visitors. Reviewers should be aware of the intentions of the makers, who are more volunteers, then quick-money-earners. This site is now only available for 2 languages. Instead of asking cash for their own reviews, it could be more wise to participate in translating this (WOT-)site to other languages??
With kind regards, A.G. Terpstra
p/s I'm a Dutch visitor, so probably my english isn't excactly what you think/expect it should be. My apologises for how I express myself in a not my own, native, language, ... .
