Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mass rating tool"

From WOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Catnose.com Mass Rating)
 
(Help rectifying MASS mis-rating.: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Catnose.com is R-Rated, but it is most definitely not hard porn.  Please re-check.
 
Catnose.com is R-Rated, but it is most definitely not hard porn.  Please re-check.
 +
 +
== Help rectifying MASS mis-rating. ==
 +
 +
http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/idahopotato.com links to
 +
http://www.mywot.com/en/forum/5034-be-sure-to-take-a-really-blaklist
 +
and it seems that the damage STILL hasn't been fixed, 2 years later.  WTF?
 +
I don't get how one user's ratings (it indicates the user Phung is responsible) would cause such a massive mis-rating.  Did a bunch of mass rating tool users act like lemmings? Anyone?  --[[User:MrElvey|MrElvey]] 23:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:25, 2 June 2011

Catnose.com is R-Rated, but it is most definitely not hard porn. Please re-check.

Help rectifying MASS mis-rating.

http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/idahopotato.com links to http://www.mywot.com/en/forum/5034-be-sure-to-take-a-really-blaklist and it seems that the damage STILL hasn't been fixed, 2 years later. WTF? I don't get how one user's ratings (it indicates the user Phung is responsible) would cause such a massive mis-rating. Did a bunch of mass rating tool users act like lemmings? Anyone? --MrElvey 23:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)